Screener
HAIL vs MOTO
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
Key differences
- HAIL costs 0.23% less per year.
- HAIL follows a index tracking strategy; MOTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAIL | MOTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $10M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.68% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.6% | +56.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -4.1% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.08% | 21.11% |
| Max drawdown | -65.98% | -38.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAIL and MOTO
Explore further