Screener
HAIL vs XTN
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
Key differences
- XTN costs 0.10% less per year.
- XTN is significantly larger than HAIL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAIL covers global markets; XTN covers north america.
- XTN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAIL | XTN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $208M |
| Since | 2017 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.68% | 0.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.6% | +48.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -4.1% | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.08% | 28.19% |
| Max drawdown | -65.98% | -43.77% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAIL and XTN
Explore further