Screener
HAP vs MOO
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.15% less per year.
- MOO is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, HAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.8% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.3% | -0.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.91% | 13.89% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -39.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and MOO
Explore further