Screener
HAP vs RAAX
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Real Assets ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.28% less per year.
- HAP is classified as equity, while RAAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- HAP follows a index tracking strategy; RAAX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | RAAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $905M |
| Since | 2008 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 1.93% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.8% | +39.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.3% | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.91% | 13.66% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -33.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and RAAX
Explore further