Screener
MOO vs RAAX
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs VanEck Real Assets ETF
Key differences
- MOO costs 0.13% less per year.
- MOO is classified as equity, while RAAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MOO follows a index tracking strategy; RAAX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOO | RAAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $905M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 1.93% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.3% | +39.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.6% | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.01 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.89% | 13.66% |
| Max drawdown | -39.52% | -33.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOO and RAAX
Explore further