Screener
RAAX vs GPZ
VanEck Real Assets ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.29% less per year.
- RAAX is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RAAX is classified as alternative, while GPZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RAAX follows a active selection strategy; GPZ uses index tracking.
- RAAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RAAX | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $905M | $245M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.66% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.91% | -31.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RAAX and GPZ
Explore further