Screener
HAP vs SLX
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Steel ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.14% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SLX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | SLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $159M |
| Since | 2008 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +80.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 24.19% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -61.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and SLX
Explore further