Screener
HAP vs URAN
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF
Key differences
- URAN costs 0.06% less per year.
- HAP is significantly larger than URAN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP covers global markets; URAN covers north america.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | URAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $30M |
| Since | 2008 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +31.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 39.30% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -31.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and URAN
Explore further