Screener
HAP vs CZAR
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
Key differences
- CZAR costs 0.06% less per year.
- HAP is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP covers global markets; CZAR covers north america.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | CZAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $2M |
| Since | 2008 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 1.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 12.55% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -13.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and CZAR
Explore further