Screener
URAN vs URA
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF vs Global X Uranium ETF
Key differences
- URAN costs 0.34% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than URAN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URAN | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $7.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 3.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.5% | +81.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +40.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +22.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.52% | 50.83% |
| Max drawdown | -31.96% | -61.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URAN and URA
Explore further