Screener
HAP vs VB
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VB costs 0.38% less per year.
- VB is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP covers global markets; VB covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $177.4B |
| Since | 2008 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 16.45% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -42.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and VB
Explore further