Screener
HAP vs VTWO
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTWO costs 0.35% less per year.
- VTWO is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP covers global markets; VTWO covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, VTWO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $16.6B |
| Since | 2008 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +19.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -41.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and VTWO
Explore further