Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

HAP vs VOO

VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

HAP

VanEck Natural Resources ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.41%

Fund size

$316M

VOO

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Vanguard

Annual cost

0.03%

Fund size

$1.6T

Key differences

  • VOO costs 0.38% less per year.
  • VOO is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • HAP covers global markets; VOO covers north america.
  • Over the last 3 years, VOO has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

HAPVOO
Annual cost (TER)0.41%0.03%
Fund size (AUM)$316M$1.6T
Since20082010
Dividend yield1.86%1.08%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+46.5%+31.1%
CAGR 3Y+18.1%+23.2%
CAGR 5Y+11.8%+14.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.911.25
Volatility 1Y14.90%11.96%
Max drawdown-44.14%-33.99%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to HAP and VOO