Screener
HAP vs VTV
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTV costs 0.38% less per year.
- VTV is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP covers global markets; VTV covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $237.8B |
| Since | 2008 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 10.21% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -36.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and VTV
Explore further