Screener
HFGM vs EFFE
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF
Key differences
- EFFE costs 0.32% less per year.
- HFGM is classified as alternative, while EFFE is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; EFFE uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | EFFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $130M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 5.05% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.77% | 19.37% |
| Max drawdown | -10.66% | -13.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGM and EFFE
Explore further