Screener
HFGM vs EPEM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- EPEM costs 0.17% less per year.
- HFGM is significantly larger than EPEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFGM is classified as alternative, while EPEM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; EPEM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | EPEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $8M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.05% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.77% | — |
| Max drawdown | -10.66% | -13.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGM and EPEM
Explore further