Screener
HFGM vs EMES
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- EMES costs 0.36% less per year.
- HFGM is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFGM is classified as alternative, while EMES is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; EMES uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | EMES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $11M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.05% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.77% | 20.51% |
| Max drawdown | -10.66% | -12.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGM and EMES
Explore further