Screener
HFGM vs GKAT
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 0.42% less per year.
- HFGM is classified as alternative, while GKAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; GKAT uses active selection.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $158M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 5.05% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.77% | — |
| Max drawdown | -10.66% | -10.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGM and GKAT
Explore further