Screener
HFND vs XRLX
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- HFND costs 0.13% less per year.
- HFND is classified as alternative, while XRLX is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- HFND follows a multi strategy strategy; XRLX uses active selection.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFND | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $51M |
| Since | 2022 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 4.72% | 2.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.4% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.44% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -13.31% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFND and XRLX
Explore further