Screener
HFND vs XNAV
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- HFND costs 0.20% less per year.
- HFND follows a multi strategy strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFND | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $31M |
| Since | 2022 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 4.72% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.4% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.44% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -13.31% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFND and XNAV
Explore further