Screener
HISF vs FCAL
First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF vs First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF
Key differences
- FCAL costs 0.34% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, HISF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HISF | FCAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.83% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $205M |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.94% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.1% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +3.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | +0.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.28 | -0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.36% | 2.72% |
| Max drawdown | -27.86% | -14.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HISF and FCAL
Explore further