Screener
HSCZ vs ECNS
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- HSCZ costs 0.16% less per year.
- HSCZ covers global markets; ECNS covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, HSCZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ECNS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HSCZ | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $82M |
| Since | 2015 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 3.04% | 6.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.4% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.9% | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.31% | 20.87% |
| Max drawdown | -34.89% | -63.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HSCZ and ECNS
Explore further