Screener
HSCZ vs EZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
Key differences
- HSCZ costs 0.07% less per year.
- EZU is significantly larger than HSCZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, HSCZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EZU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HSCZ | EZU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $9.5B |
| Since | 2015 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 3.04% | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.28% | 16.93% |
| Max drawdown | -34.89% | -41.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HSCZ and EZU
Explore further