Screener
HUMN vs QDTE
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF vs Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Key differences
- HUMN costs 0.21% less per year.
- QDTE is significantly larger than HUMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HUMN follows a structured outcome strategy; QDTE uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| HUMN | QDTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.96% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $828M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 45.82% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +42.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.95% |
| Max drawdown | -20.40% | -22.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HUMN and QDTE
Explore further