Screener
QDTE vs NERD
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Roundhill Video Games ETF
Key differences
- NERD costs 0.46% less per year.
- QDTE is significantly larger than NERD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while NERD is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; NERD uses index tracking.
- NERD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | NERD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $16M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.9% | -13.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 20.10% |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -65.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QDTE and NERD
Explore further