Screener
HYLS vs BDGS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF vs Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Key differences
- HYLS costs 0.18% less per year.
- HYLS is significantly larger than BDGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYLS is classified as alternative, while BDGS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HYLS follows a long short strategy; BDGS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BDGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HYLS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYLS | BDGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $42M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 6.65% | 0.53% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.56% | 6.06% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -9.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYLS and BDGS
Explore further