Screener
KDRN vs BDGS
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Key differences
- KDRN costs 0.25% less per year.
- BDGS is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KDRN is classified as fixed income, while BDGS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KDRN follows a index tracking strategy; BDGS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BDGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KDRN | BDGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $42M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 0.53% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.64% | 6.06% |
| Max drawdown | -15.29% | -9.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KDRN and BDGS
Explore further