Screener
IBAT vs BILT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
Key differences
- IBAT costs 0.13% less per year.
- IBAT covers global markets; BILT covers north america.
- IBAT follows a index tracking strategy; BILT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | BILT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $26M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.23% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -5.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and BILT
Explore further