Screener
IBAT vs IGF
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.08% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $10.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.9% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.23% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and IGF
Explore further