Screener
IBAT vs ENHI
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.20% less per year.
- IBAT is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBAT is classified as equity, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IBAT follows a index tracking strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $11M |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.23% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and ENHI
Explore further