Screener
IBAT vs IYM
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
Key differences
- IYM costs 0.09% less per year.
- IYM is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBAT covers global markets; IYM covers north america.
- IYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | IYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +117.7% | +38.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.82% | 18.63% |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -42.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and IYM
Explore further