Screener
IBAT vs FMAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
Key differences
- FMAT costs 0.39% less per year.
- FMAT is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBAT covers global markets; FMAT covers north america.
- FMAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $603M |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +117.7% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.82% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -41.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and FMAT
Explore further