Screener
IBLC vs FMET
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs Fidelity Metaverse ETF
Key differences
- FMET costs 0.08% less per year.
- IBLC is classified as alternative, while FMET is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IBLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBLC | FMET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $45M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +76.5% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +51.9% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 55.29% | 19.55% |
| Max drawdown | -62.54% | -29.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBLC and FMET
Explore further