Screener
IBLC vs VERS
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs ProShares Metaverse ETF
Key differences
- IBLC costs 0.11% less per year.
- IBLC is significantly larger than VERS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBLC is classified as alternative, while VERS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IBLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBLC | VERS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $6M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 0.30% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +76.5% | +66.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +51.9% | +33.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 55.29% | 26.51% |
| Max drawdown | -62.54% | -42.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBLC and VERS
Explore further