Screener
IBLC vs URTH
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.23% less per year.
- URTH is significantly larger than IBLC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBLC is classified as alternative, while URTH is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IBLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- URTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBLC | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $9.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +76.5% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +51.9% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 55.29% | 12.17% |
| Max drawdown | -62.54% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBLC and URTH
Explore further