Screener
VERS vs FMET
ProShares Metaverse ETF vs Fidelity Metaverse ETF
Key differences
- FMET costs 0.19% less per year.
- FMET is significantly larger than VERS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VERS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VERS | FMET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $45M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.30% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +66.9% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +33.4% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.51% | 19.55% |
| Max drawdown | -42.13% | -29.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VERS and FMET
Explore further