Screener
IBOT vs ESPO
Vaneck Robotics ETF vs VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
Key differences
- IBOT costs 0.08% less per year.
- ESPO is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IBOT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ESPO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBOT | ESPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $257M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +58.1% | -9.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.06% | 19.07% |
| Max drawdown | -25.39% | -50.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBOT and ESPO
Explore further