Screener
IBOT vs GPZ
Vaneck Robotics ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.07% less per year.
- GPZ is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBOT | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $245M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +58.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.06% | — |
| Max drawdown | -25.39% | -31.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBOT and GPZ
Explore further