Screener
IBOT vs HAP
Vaneck Robotics ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.06% less per year.
- HAP is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IBOT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBOT | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $316M |
| Since | 2023 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +58.1% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.06% | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -25.39% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBOT and HAP
Explore further