Screener
IBOT vs THNQ
Vaneck Robotics ETF vs Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- IBOT costs 0.21% less per year.
- THNQ is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, THNQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBOT | THNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $322M |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.3% | +68.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.0% | +38.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.95% | 25.96% |
| Max drawdown | -25.39% | -50.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBOT and THNQ
Explore further