Screener
ICLN vs PBW
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.25% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than PBW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICLN covers global markets; PBW covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $447M |
| Since | 2008 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +78.6% | +150.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.3% | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.99% | 40.29% |
| Max drawdown | -66.75% | -89.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLN and PBW
Explore further