Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PBW vs SMOG

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF

PBW

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$447M

SMOG

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$152M

Key differences

  • PBW covers north america markets; SMOG covers global.
  • Over the last 3 years, SMOG has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

PBWSMOG
Annual cost (TER)0.64%0.64%
Fund size (AUM)$447M$152M
Since20052007
Dividend yield0.71%1.31%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaglobal
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+150.5%+43.1%
CAGR 3Y+7.2%+11.7%
CAGR 5Y-8.6%+3.0%
Sharpe 3Y0.290.45
Volatility 1Y40.29%20.30%
Max drawdown-89.06%-51.11%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to PBW and SMOG