Screener
PBW vs PBD
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- PBW costs 0.11% less per year.
- PBW covers north america markets; PBD covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $208M |
| Since | 2005 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +150.5% | +88.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.29% | 23.23% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and PBD
Explore further