Screener
ICLN vs PIO
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco Global Water ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.36% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than PIO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLN | PIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $281M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +87.9% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +8.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.34 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.93% | 14.70% |
| Max drawdown | -66.75% | -35.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLN and PIO
Explore further