Screener
ICLO vs FCLO
Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF vs Fidelity CLO ETF
Key differences
- FCLO costs 0.19% less per year.
- ICLO is significantly larger than FCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICLO follows a active selection strategy; FCLO uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLO | FCLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $448M | $25M |
| Since | 2022 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 5.26% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.38% | — |
| Max drawdown | -3.46% | -0.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLO and FCLO
Explore further