Screener
IDEF vs QQH
iShares Defense Industrials Act vs HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- IDEF costs 0.43% less per year.
- IDEF is significantly larger than QQH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDEF is classified as equity, while QQH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IDEF covers global markets; QQH covers north america.
- IDEF follows a index tracking strategy; QQH uses active selection.
- QQH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDEF | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.5B | $697M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.21% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.65% | 20.79% |
| Max drawdown | -14.63% | -41.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDEF and QQH
Explore further