Screener
QQH vs ITA
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF vs iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
Key differences
- ITA costs 0.60% less per year.
- ITA is significantly larger than QQH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QQH is classified as alternative, while ITA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QQH follows a active selection strategy; ITA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QQH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ITA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QQH | ITA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $697M | $13.6B |
| Since | 2019 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +32.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.9% | +26.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.1% | +17.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.79% | 20.61% |
| Max drawdown | -41.87% | -51.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QQH and ITA
Explore further