Screener
IDVZ vs DIVS
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- DIVS costs 0.30% less per year.
- IDVZ is significantly larger than DIVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDVZ | DIVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $39M |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 1.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +11.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.89% | 10.54% |
| Max drawdown | -10.99% | -29.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDVZ and DIVS
Explore further