Screener
IDVZ vs DIV
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
Key differences
- DIV costs 0.30% less per year.
- DIV is significantly larger than IDVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDVZ covers global markets; DIV covers north america.
- IDVZ follows a active selection strategy; DIV uses index tracking.
- DIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDVZ | DIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $750M |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 6.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.89% | 10.29% |
| Max drawdown | -10.99% | -52.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDVZ and DIV
Explore further