Screener
IDVZ vs PFM
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- PFM costs 0.23% less per year.
- PFM is significantly larger than IDVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDVZ covers global markets; PFM covers north america.
- IDVZ follows a active selection strategy; PFM uses index tracking.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDVZ | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $764M |
| Since | 2024 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.89% | 9.63% |
| Max drawdown | -10.99% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDVZ and PFM
Explore further